Much attention has recently been paid to Emmanuelle Riva,
who at 85 is the oldest nominee ever for the Best Actress Oscar. I have not yet
seen Amour, but I’ve never forgotten
her bravery in Hiroshima, Mon Amour,
a 1959 landmark of French New Wave cinema. If the Academy chooses to honor Riva,
it will be for a sterling performance, but also for her place in cinema
history.
I wonder how she feels, and how the other nominees feel, about
the fact that one of their competitors is not only a brand-new actress but
pretty much a brand-new person. Quvenzhané
Wallis, now a charming nine-year-old, was only five when she auditioned for the
leading role in Beasts of the Southern
Wild, and she went before the cameras at six. Now she’s the youngest Best Actress candidate in Oscar
history, which must make such doddering oldsters as Naomi Watts (born 1968),
Jessica Chastain (born 1977), and Jennifer Lawrence (born 1990) wonder why they
wasted so much time learning their craft.
Of course there are many factors at work here. To win Oscar
gold, you need to be the right actor in
the right project. Your film needs to be a critical success, and today an
award-season strategy involving paid consultants and freebies for voters is
definitely part of the mix. And if you’re a young newcomer, the Actress
categories are more welcoming than those for Best Actor and Supporting Actor, because
the men’s competition is always more crowded.
Abigail Breslin was a mere ten when she became a Best Actress nominee
for Little Miss Sunshine, though by
that point she was a veteran of several movies.
But both Tatum O’Neal and Anna Paquin took home Best Supporting Actress
statuettes for their debut films, Paper
Moon and The Piano. O’Neal was
ten, and Paquin a ripe old eleven.
What gives? How did these largely untrained amateurs get to
play with the big girls? Partly it’s a matter of savvy casting: finding a child
whose personality and life situation nicely match the role she’s asked to
assume. Tatum O’Neal, who’d endured a tumultuous upbringing and was
street-smart beyond her years, took easily to playing a con artist alongside
her actual father. Wallis, a Louisiana native, has the fearlessness and the sass
essential to the role of Hushpuppy. A drama teacher I know insists that most
children are natural-born actors. They excel at “let’s pretend” because they
are comfortable shrugging off social niceties and entering fully into the part
they are asked to play. It’s only when they approach their teens that they
become self-conscious, which is why older actors have to learn to be as
spontaneous and in-the-moment as children. So if you combine a kid’s natural
flair for the dramatic with a role that’s a perfect fit, magic can happen.
There’s another category of first-time actors who’ve made a
splash on Oscar night: people who have such close personal ties to the roles
they play that they are essentially playing themselves. Oscar voters salute
them because they have endured the unendurable, and brought this experience to
the screen. Haing S. Ngor survived Pol Pot’s Cambodia, then re-enacted his
suffering in The Killing Fields. Harold
Russell was the perfect choice to play a gutsy World War II vet in The Best Years of Our Lives. I just
learned that Russell’s role was originally meant to showcase a returning
soldier suffering from PTSD. But when the production team learned of Russell,
who had lost both arms in a military training accident, they knew they had the
right man for this film.
I saw Beasts of the Southern Wild and loved it and thought Quvenzhané Wallis was terrific although I don't think what she accomplished was acting in the same sense in which a trained older person acts.
ReplyDeleteIt was interesting that almost always we hear her voice only in voiceover. In a sense her job is split in two: to act with gesture, expression, body language, etc. and to act through speech.
I wondered if the director made the decision to do this because it made the job easier for a six-year-old. Does anyone know?
I don't know, but this is an excellent question, Joan. I know that Beasts of the Southern Wild was originally a stage play (featuring a little boy rather than a girl), and the stage is well-suited to voiceover narration. I also suspect, given the realities of casting a movie, that the production team wouldn't want to completely rewrite its screenplay to suit the child they'd chosen to cast. I'm sure there were small adjustments made, and the voiceover was probably recorded after principal photography was complete. But my guess is that little Quevnzhane was chosen because out of all the candidates she was best able to bring the existing script to life. (One thing I need to add: much as I loved her, I sometimes found her speech patterns hard to fathom. I'm sure her accent was authentic, but it sometimes defeated my understanding of what she was saying.) Thanks for visiting Beverly in Movieland, Joan -- and do drop by again soon!
ReplyDeleteSadly, the actual voting and winners were far more staid and expected than either the oldest or youngest nominees.
ReplyDeleteAmen to that, Mr. Craig.
ReplyDelete