Thanks to Dwayne Epstein’s labor-of-love biography of
tough-guy Lee Marvin, I’ve just spent a fascinating week with The Killers. Epstein, a veteran show biz
journalist, devoted almost two decades to researching his new Lee Marvin: Point Blank. Many of the
Hollywood luminaries whom Epstein interviews are, alas, now long gone. But
their words help him paint a vivid picture of a man who brought to the screen
the raw savagery of his real-life experiences in the jungles of World War II.
Marvin, one of Hollywood’s favorite anti-heroes, took on
Marlon Brando in The Wild One, acted
opposite Vivien Leigh in Stanley Kramer’s Ship
of Fools, played the title character in the John Ford classic The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, and
won a Best-Actor Oscar for an outrageously comic role in Cat Ballou. As a Roger Corman alumna, I’m struck by how often Marvin
crossed paths with Cormanites. He worked with early Corman protégé Monte
Hellman on Avalanche Express, and
starred in Sam Fuller’s gritty war drama The
Big Red One, produced by Roger’s brother Gene. Long after Marvin’s death,
Joe Dante’s Small Soldiers paid
tribute to one of his most popular films, The
Dirty Dozen.
Then there’s The
Killers, which has a most unusual provenance. It began as an Ernest
Hemingway short story, a mere eleven pages long, that was first published in
Scribner’s Magazine in 1927. The story opens with two hired killers entering a
small-town diner, looking for a loner nicknamed the Swede. When the Swede is warned
by a local that his life is in danger, he shows no inclination to flee. That’s
pretty much the whole story: it ends with the diner’s counter-man pondering the
Swede’s mysterious situation. Nothing really happens, but the story’s ending is
steeped in a sense of foreboding.
Hollywood, of course,
can’t leave it at that. The 1946 version of The
Killers, a classic film noir
directed by Robert Siodmak, starts off just as Hemingway does. When the Swede
(played by Burt Lancaster in his movie debut) hears that two thugs are after
him, he grimly implies that he deserves his fate. Soon he is dead, and the rest
of the film (told in intricate flashbacks) involves a cop and an insurance
investigator tracking down exactly what brought him to this pass. The Swede
took part in a payroll robbery, it seems, and he apparently double-crossed his
partners, keeping the loot for himself. But there’s also a girl, played by the
glamorous Ava Gardner. She’s got eyes for Lancaster. But her heart—who can say?
In 1964, The Killers was
redone by Don Siegel as the world’s first made-for-television movie. Though the
basic thrust of the plot is similar, the set-up of this full-color version is
markedly different. Star Lee Marvin plays not the victim, but rather one of the
killers. They ruthlessly gun down their victim (John Cassavetes), a former
racecar driver who’s now teaching auto mechanics at a school for the blind. The
fact that Cassavetes, though forewarned, chooses not to escape from his killers’
clutches sets Marvin to wondering about the whereabouts of the $1 million with
which Cassavetes apparently absconded after a mail robbery. So he and his
sidekick spend the rest of the film tracking down the rest of the robbers and
figuring out who double-crossed whom. The girl in this version is the
deliciously dangerous Angie Dickinson. But the big surprise is the #1 bad guy,
who’s so slimy he even slugs women. Yes, it’s our 40th president,
going mano à mano with the deadly Lee Marvin. Which of the two is more evil?
In this case it would Mr. Reagan - in his last role before moving into politics. I was amazed at how mean his character is in the movie - certainly a far cry from Bedtime for Bonzo!
ReplyDelete(And after that cheap - and oft used - joke, I will point out how good Ronnie's performance is in Kings Row.)
I like both versions of the movie - with killer William Conrad standing out in the first version, and the entire cool cast in the 60's go-round - including Clu Gulager, another fave of mine!
I haven't gotten Mr. Epstein's book - but I will one day - it sounds like fascinating reading!
I think I prefer the earlier film for its film noir look and feel, but there's a lot to enjoy in the Lee Marvin version. Who can resist Angie Dickinson at her slinkiest? And Clu Gulager -- as the lethal sidekick who resembles a bratty kid with ADHD -- is a true original. The Don Siegel version does drag a bit, though, and there's far too much footage of race cars going around a track for my taste.
ReplyDelete