The smart money in this year’s Oscar race seems to be on
either The Shape of Water or Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri. It’s
hard to say which has the better chance, but my guess is that voters of a more
cynical bent will opt for Martin McDonagh’s bitter (yet fascinating) story of
loss and retribution, while the optimists in the Academy will prefer Guillermo
del Toro’s uplifting (yet bizarre) otherworldly love story. In del Toro’s
telling, the love of a human woman and a sea creature certainly has an ethereal
side. He deftly balances this, however, with a lot of real-world squalor and
Cold War anxiety. That’s my problem with another of this year’s contenders. It’s
so gorgeous, so swoon-worthy, that it doesn’t seem part of real life at all.
I’m talking, of course, about Call Me By Your Name, a film that’s all-aquiver with the intensity
of its lovers’ passion. I remember hearing about this film after last year’s
Sundance: from the start it was seen as an awards contender. And perhaps in a
different year it would be at the top of the heap, at least in part to make up
for the fact that in 2006 the Academy denied a Best Picture Oscar to another
gay love story, Brokeback Mountain. I
was fascinated by the inarticulate cowboys in that film. And I can’t deny that
the actors in Call Me By Your Name are
both attractive and convincing. Timothée Chalamet, the youngest man in many
years to be up for a Best Actor Oscar, is a powerful presence, one whose
emotional highs and lows seem to leap off the screen. (It’s completely
irrelevant, but I’m enthralled by the fact that his mother’s brother, director
Rodman Flender, was a colleague of mine at Concorde Pictures. I always thought
Rodman had a distinctive look and manner, and now I see it runs in the family.)
Still, I must say I found this film hard to take, for
reasons that have nothing to do with moral outrage. Under the guidance of
Italian director Luca Guadagnino, it’s so slow, so limpid, so sensitive. Yes, the photography is
beautiful: it captures lives that are so blissfully sensuous that they seem to
have nothing to do with the world as I know it. It’s the height of summer in a
small Italian town. The Perlman family are ensconced in their 17th
century villa, where they have no obligation to do anything but read books,
play music, swim in the river, and think deep thoughts. The father (well played
by Michael Stuhlbarg) is a renowned scholar of archaeology, so he occasionally
waxes poetic about the alluring beauty of Greek statuary, but he seems to have
no pressing duties. Seventeen-year-old son Elio (Chalamet) rides around town on
a bicycle, half-heartedly experiments with sex with a local girl, and then
cuddles on a sofa with his parents while his mother reads aloud from a German
novel she translates on the spot. (The Perlmans have the maddening habit of
switching from English to French to Italian in casual conversation.) Then a hunky
grad student named Oliver (Armie Hammer) arrives, and Elio is totally smitten.
Soon amid all those perfect al fresco meals and smoothies made by the maid from perfect peaches
plucked from a perfect backyard orchard, Oliver and Elio are taking tentative
steps to acknowledge what they feel for one another. And the world’s most
understanding parents are quietly cheering them on. Actually, Oliver – though pretty
-- was for me pretty much a blank. I suspect Timothée Chalamet’s Elio can do
much better.