Last week I was musing about my experience in a local
multiplex, watching 12 Years a Slave while
trying to block out the rantings of a woman in the throes of dementia. Part of
my point was that moviegoing is intended as a communal experience. Traditionally,
movies are made to be seen by large groups of people, feeding off of one
another’s amusement, or exaltation, or fear. Yes, it’s maddening to be
disturbed by an unruly patron in the next row. But those choosing to watch a video
solo, in the privacy of their homes, are missing out on something: jokes aren’t
as funny and scare moments aren’t as shivery if they’re not shared.
Back in 1976, I watched a brand-new film called Rocky in a packed neighborhood theatre.
During the climactic bout between Rocky and Apollo Creed, the L.A. audience was
emotionally transported. In our minds we were all ringside at a live sporting
event, and we were not embarrassed to cheer aloud for our hero. It was deafening
in that theatre—and thrilling!
Then there was the
day that I (as a young film critic) was invited to write about Teshigahara’s Woman in the Dunes. It’s a stark film
about isolation and entrapment, and I saw it completely alone, sitting in the
middle of an empty art house. My solitary viewing perhaps brought home the
film’s lessons with special force, but I cannot think of that afternoon without
a shudder.
The subject came up recently when I discussed Roger Corman
with Mark Lynch, whose “Inquiry” is heard weekly on WICN (90.5 FM) in Central
Massachusetts. Mark, a true movie buff, as a young man traveled from Worcester to
Boston to experience William Castle’s The
Tingler, complete with wired theatre seats. He’ll never forget the hysteria
and the laughter greeting the moment when creature apparently springs from the
screen and gets loose among the moviegoers. The crowd reaction was so intense
that he never did see The Tingler’s
last 10 minutes.
Since
my interview, which you can check out here, I’ve discovered that Mark has
thought long and hard about the effects
a movie can have on a home viewer. He
recalled, “I had a very bad case of the flu once (temps 104-105) and I began to
watch The Harvey Girls, going in and
out of awareness . . . . I began to think the film just consisted of different
versions of “The Atcheson, Topeka, and the Santa Fe.” Apparently I kept dozing
off and on during that one number and thought a lot of time passed. Then I kept
the TV on and all the subsequent films (a film noir and some comedy) all wove
themselves together into one huge disjointed film in my mind. Very uneven, but
it all sort of made (feverish) sense. ‘Where's Judy Garland?’ I kept thinking,
then dozing off again.”
Mark has his pet
theories about comfort films, the videos that make you feel better when you’re down.
No, he wouldn’t suggest Eraserhead. On
his list for colds is Forbidden Planet (“I
bet the Kryll had a cure for the cold”). Or maybe The Andromeda Strain (“I guess my cold
could be worse”). For stress or general malaise, he advises The Seventh Seal (“It's so dark and
serious, I have to feel better in comparison,” Anyway, “it's just
great to wallow in Swedish misanthropy.”)
I have my own disturbing memories of trying to use movies to
stave off serious illness. It didn’t exactly work, but being in a cinematic Twilight
Zone at least helped pass the time.
I can't watch much of anything when sick - I just shut down and sleep round the clock.
ReplyDeleteWhatever works, of course.
ReplyDelete