The word “frozen” reminds today’s movie fans of a
blockbuster family film, the first from Walt Disney Animation Studios to ever win
an Oscar for best animated feature. Ironically, it also suggests a longstanding
rumor about Disney himself. Here’s how Neal Gabler opens his 2006 biography, Walt Disney: The Triumph of the American Imagination -- “He was frozen. At least that was the rumor that emerged
shortly after his death and quickly became legend: Walt Disney had been
cryogenically preserved, hibernating like Snow White and Sleeping Beauty, to
await the day when science could revive him and cure his disease.”
In truth Disney, who died of lung cancer in 1966 at the age
of 65, was cremated, and his remains interred at Glendale’s Forest Lawn. But
Gabler’s most memorable revelations are about the young Walt Disney, who was a
far cry from the jolly Uncle Walt we Baby Boomers remember. As a youthful
cartoonist, Disney was wildly ambitious, desperate to overcome childhood
deprivation by using his drawing pencil to make his mark on the world. Gabler
explains, “For a young man who had chafed within the stern, moralistic,
anhedonic world of his father, animation provided escape, and for someone who
had always been subjugated by that father, it provided absolute control. In
animation Walt Disney had a world of his own.”
But such was Walt’s fundamental restlessness that he could
never be satisfied with a single category of achievement. That’s why the Mickey
Mouse short subjects led to the feature-length Snow White, which led to the experimental Fantasia, to live-action features, and wild-life documentaries.
Veteran Disney animator Milt Kahl put it this way: “He was interested in a
picture until he had all the problems solved and then he just lost interest.” At
times, Walt turned away from movies altogether, devoting all his energies to
the creation of Disneyland, and then to the concept of a gargantuan utopian
community that became Walt Disney World. At the end of his life, his dream of
founding a City of Arts evolved into a unique interdisciplinary university,
today’s CalArts.
I never met Walt Disney. But in reading Gabler’s portrait of
him, I couldn’t help recalling a restless figure who loomed large in my own
life, B-movie legend Roger Corman. Obviously they are known for very different
kinds of entertainment: Roger is famous for lurid monster movies, not wholesome
family fare. And Disney’s artistic perfectionism would not suit a man who could
happily grind out 20 low-budget quickies in a single year. Still, Roger as
producer is very much like Disney in his prime, a superb storyteller who may
not have been hands-on in the daily running of his company, but whose “sensibilities
governed everything the studio produced.” A point that former Disney staffers sometimes
made – “he’s a genius at using someone else’s genius” – is one that fits Roger
as well. And the comment of one Disney
underling that “you’d do anything for a smile, even though the next day you might
be fired” certainly applies.
Gabler also emphasizes Walt Disney’s fundamental loneliness.
Even when among members of his own family, “he was so self-absorbed, so fully
within his own mind and ideas, that he emerged only to share them and to have
them executed.” That’s Roger Corman to a T. One big difference, though. Walt
Disney, especially in the early years, could be a spendthrift. That’s why he
needed his older brother to keep him on the fiscal straight and narrow. But
Roger, divided soul that he is, functions as both Walt and Roy, the dreamer and
the tight-fisted money guy.
I’ll be interviewing
Neal Gabler on the subject of his Walt Disney and Walter Winchell biographies
at the annual conference of the American Society of Journalists and Authors, April
24-26 in New York City. The public is cordially welcome to many terrific sessions.
Mr. Gabler's book sounds fascinating - another tome for my mountainous "To Read" pile. I'd also love to attend your conference - but I don't think I'll be in NYC those days.
ReplyDeleteIf only Walt Disney had had a few more years in him - imagine a world where in the early 1970's Roger Corman had teamed with Disney for some New World sequels to earlier Disney hits - but with that New World exploitation flare - like Kurt Russell in "The Barechested Executive" or "Now You See Them Now You Don't" - surefire hits, wouldn't you think?
Wow, what a thought! Disney and Corman are similar in being midwesterners by birth, liking to drink, and having some choice swear-words in their vocabularies. But a collaboration? Hmmm. What about The Shaggy Werewolf? Or The Absent-Minded Prostitute?
ReplyDeleteHow is it possible that Frozen is the first Disney best animated feature win? When was that category instituted?
ReplyDeleteGood question, Gratteciella. This category has only existed since 2001, when the winner was "Shrek." Pixar, owned by Disney, has won several times, but the historic animation unit founded by Walt Disney had never won an Oscar until now. (For what it's worth, "Beauty and the Beast" was actually nominated for Best Picture in 1992, but it was beaten out by an even more "beastly" film, "The Silence of the Lambs.")
ReplyDeleteI should clarify that Walt Disney Animation Studios has won plenty of Oscars, honorary and otherwise, but NOT an Oscar for best animated feature, since the category didn't exist until recently. Several Disney cartoons (e.g. "Pinocchio," "Aladdin") have won awards for Best Song and Best Score, and Disney has also won multiple times for animated shorts.
ReplyDelete