To my mind, Molly Haskell is a feminist icon.
Haskell—author, teacher, film critic—is also a gracious individual, and I’ve
enjoyed chatting with her over the years about movies and life. (Yes, she wrote
a fabulous blurb for my Seduced by Mrs.
Robinson: How The Graduate Became the
Touchstone of a Generation.) Haskell has published books about everything
from Gone With the Wind to the career
of Steven Spielberg to her brother’s late-in-life transformation into her
sister. But her best-known book is still her first. From Reverence to Rape: The Treatment of Women in the Movies. First
published in 1974, it was updated in 1987, and then reissued in a beautiful
paperback edition in 2016.
Haskell’s thesis, presented in lively prose, is that female
characters—who were once at the very center of Hollywood screen scenarios—have
been increasingly marginalized. Whereas there used to be heroines of stature, more recent
films have regarded women as villains or victims, or else basically
non-existent. Haskell’s study ends in the eighties, but has much to say to
today’s moviegoers. A Wonder Woman or
an Ocean’s Eight notwithstanding,
just think of all those Hollywood hits that are essentially all male, with a
few bimbos and wives-back-home added as set decoration.
Haskell is uniquely sensitive to the part played by movie
stars in Golden Age Hollywood. She regards stars like Garbo, Bette Davis, and
Katharine Hepburn as auteurs in their own right, casting their larger-than-life
shadows over all of their roles. She also finds a particular fascination in the
so-called Woman’s Film, the once hugely-popular genre in which a female star
faces (and often triumphs by way of) heartache. Her book contains so many
provocative thoughts that it’s hard to corral even a few of them, but here, as
she discusses the Woman’s Film, is her
take on child-bearing and child-rearing: “Children are an obsession in American
movies—sacrifice of and for children, the use of children as justification for
all manner of sacrifice—in marked contrast to European films about love and
romantic intrigue, where children rarely appear at all and are almost never the
instruments of judgment they are in American films.”
Such Haskell pronouncements led me to compare two classic
films about mother love, Stella Dallas
(1937) and Mildred Pierce (1941).
Both contain powerful central performances by genuine Hollywood stars: Barbara
Stanwyck and Joan Crawford. Crawford, as Mildred, claws her way up the food
chain in order to provide all the finer things for her social-climbing
daughter, Veda. Ultimately, after years of being rebuffed by the ungrateful
Veda, Mildred finds herself trying to save her daughter from a murder rap. In Stella Dallas, Stanwyck plays a high-spirited
young woman from the wrong side of the tracks. We see her woo and win a man
who’s her social better, and their marriage—doomed from the start—produces a
charming young daughter named Laurel. Stella works hard to give Laurel every
social advantage, but mother and daughter are snubbed by Laurel’s prissy
schoolmates and their parents. Finally, in the name of mother-love, Stella
pretends to reject Laurel, turning her over to her father for a more genteel
upbringing. The final scene shows Stanwyck standing in the rain, spying through
the window of a mansion on her daughter’s fairytale society wedding.
Molly once told me that “you find what you need in movies.”
Her affection for Doris Day in films like Lover
Come Back stems from her own youthful desire to move to New York (from her
home in Richmond, Virginia) and become a working woman. At that she has
succeeded magnificently.
No comments:
Post a Comment