We’re all aware, at least if we watch American television,
that right now talk-show hosts are something of an endangered species. Gone are
the days when a man like Johnny Carson (or Jay Leno) was a friendly face in our
living rooms, poking impish fun at celebrities and politicians without fear of
retribution. Now Stephen Colbert’s months at CBS are numbered. And Jimmy Kimmel
seemed to have gotten the axe when the powers-that-be disapproved of one of his
jokes. (Surprisingly, the backlash was such that he was quickly reinstated.)
But itl makes you wonder why anyone would risk it all to
tell jokes on late-night television.
What exactly is the attraction? The money? The laughs? The opportunity
to take on the status quo? The need, pure and simple, to connect with an
audience?
These thoughts flitted through my mind as I sat down to
watch an unlikely 1982 film by Martin Scorsese, one that contains no gangsters
and no boxers. (Yes, there’s a taxi-driver or two, but not in a role of any
significance.) You could say, though, that this—like so many other Scorsese
projects—is a film about an obsession. Robert De Niro, starring in his fifth film
for Scorsese, plays Rupert Pupkin, an intense young man determined to make it
as a stand-up comedian. None other than Jerry Lewis, then in his fifties, plays
Jerry Langford, a comedian of the Carson ilk with a wide base of adoring fans.
By happenstance, Pupkin protects Langford from a frenzied mob, then tries to
worm his way into the great man’s home and heart as a way of launching his own career
as a comedian. What does he want? To commence his own climb to fame and fortune
via the opening spot on Langford’s nightly broadcast. How does he go about
achieving this? With the manic determination that marks so many Scorsese
protagonists. And, of course, a little touch of mayhem.
It's fun to see De Niro, hyper-familiar in brutal parts,
desperately playing at being ingratiating. And Lewis, eschewing his usual comic
shtik, is convincing as a very private man forced to make nice, much against
his nature, to someone who has obviously gone off the rails. For me the big
surprise is comedian Sandra Bernhard, who essentially plays De Niro’s partner
in crime, working her own surprisingly sexual obsession with Langford while
helping clear the way for Pupkin’s leap into the big time.
This is not, despite its title, a movie that is full of
chuckles. But it does use very black humor to probe the excesses of fandom,
something which continues—thanks to the Internet—to be more and more a part of
our everyday world. The King of
Comedy builds to a climax and then a coda that have aroused much
discussion: the movie doesn’t end in the likeliest of ways. Some moviegoers
(like me) have appreciated its heavy-duty irony; others are not so sure.
Admirers of Scorsese are apparently divided on the merits of
this film. Some critics of the day embraced De Niro’s character as the flip
side of Taxi Driver’s Travis Bickle; others (including the influential
Pauline Kael) were convinced Scorsese had lost his way. If Wikipedia is to be
believed, such cinema wonderworkers as Akira Kurosawa and Wim Wenders have
ranked The King of Comedy among their very favorite films. Fans in
today’s Hollywood include Steve Carell and Jack Black, who would like to star
in a remake. I don’t suspect that this will happen anytime soon, if ever. But
the nature of comedy, as a subject, never truly grows old.
No comments:
Post a Comment