Well, none of us is getting any younger. And Hollywood
actresses, who’ve always relied on youth and beauty to fuel their careers, know
better than most that ageing is tantamount to career suicide. Ten years ago,
Amy Schumer went so far as to join with gal pals Tina Fey, Julia Louis-Dreyfus,
and Patricia Arquette in a darkly comic video short, all of them desperate to
stave off the approach of their so-called “Last F**kable Day.”
But things were perhaps even worse in Old Hollywood. When
Audrey Hepburn, still under 30, was romantically paired with fifty-six-year-old
Gary Cooper in 1957’s Love in the Afternoon, this confirmed the basic
Tinseltown understanding that—for women, at least—the freshness of youth was
everything. As for those talented actresses who weren’t as young as they used
to be, they had to accept that they were now considered by studio honchos to be
damaged goods. And so it happened that two of the Golden Age’s most revered
stars suddenly had to accept lesser projects to fill up their dance cards.
Bette Davis, who arrived in Hollywood in 1930, had some
rough years before she triumphed in the powerful role of a slatternly waitress in
a screen adaptation of Somerset Maugham’s Of Human Bondage: it led to a unique
write-in Oscar nomination. Thereafter she made her mark in a series of historical
and romantic dramas, including Jezebel (1938); Dark Victory (1939);
Now, Voyager (1942); and the wonderful All About Eve (1950): she ultimately won the Best Actress Oscar
twice, and was officially nominated a record ten times. For years she was Warner Bros.’ most
bankable star, specializing in bold, uncompromising portrayals of strong women.
Joan Crawford, started out as a Broadway dancer, then in
1925 was signed to a contract at classy MGM, where she first specialized in
playing flappers and then working girls who made good. Depression audiences
loved her, and she was a marvelous hussy in The Women (1939), but eventually
she wore out her welcome at MGM and moved to Warners in 1943. The noirish Mildred
Pierce (1945) revived her career and won her an Oscar, but sharing the
Warners lot with Queen Bee Bette Davis was a challenge.
By 1962, Davis and Crawford (both in their fifties) found
their careers had essentially dried up. That’s when someone got the bright idea
of pairing these two fading stars in a Grand Guignol-style horror movie, What
Ever Happened to Baby Jane? Their fabled real-life feud made audiences run
to see them play two sisters who were once stars of the silver screen and now
live together in a mansion where bad things happen. Someone has said that on
film Davis is the quintessential sadist and Crawford (with her tremulous
expressions) the quintessential masochist. In this film, so it plays out.
Davis’s character, once the golden-haired kiddie star Baby Jane, is a drunk
with a skewed view of reality. Crawford plays her sister, formerly a leading
lady but now confined to a wheelchair after a mysterious accident that is
explained (in a way that thoroughly baffled me) at the end of the film. Both
are essentially grotesque, but Baby Jane revived their popularity, and
Davis (though not Crawford) thereby racked up one more Oscar nom.
Sad, though, that two fifty-year-old actresses needed to
stoop to such trashy material. Happily, at least one great actress today still
has her pick of roles. Everywhere I turn, I see photos of Meryl Streep, at 77,
looking devastatingly glamorous in ads for The Devil Wears Prada 2. Yes, she plays a sort of villain, but a
gorgeous one.
No comments:
Post a Comment